eprintid: 23626
rev_number: 120
userid: 4019
dir: disk0/00/02/36/26
datestamp: 2015-08-17 19:54:53
lastmod: 2021-03-11 05:58:32
status_changed: 2015-08-17 19:54:53
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
contact_email: rtaber21@gmail.com
item_issues_count: 0
eprint_status: archive
creators_name: Taber, Rachel
contributors_type: committee_chair
contributors_type: committee_member
contributors_name: Kingsley, Lawrence A.
contributors_name: Felter, Elizabeth Madison
contributors_email: kingsley@pitt.edu
contributors_email: emmadison@mindspring.com
contributors_id: KINGSLEY
contributors_id: 
title: Crisis and risk communication: public health issues of hazard, outrage, and Ebola virus
ispublished: unpub
divisions: sch_gsph_infectiousdiseasesmicrobiology
full_text_status: public
keywords: Ebola, crisis, and, emergency, risk, communication
abstract: This essay presents issues pertinent to crisis and emergency risk communication for future public health leaders in the infectious disease field. The technique includes an educational component and methods to remove barriers to communication. The relevance of risk communication to the field is that this method facilitates the presentation of accurate information that the public can comprehend and act upon to make informed health decisions. Infectious disease experts understand the science inherent to a health hazard (e.g. pathogens) and are trained in public health practice. Informing the public about health risks is increasingly falling to public health leaders who have no training in effective communication methods. This means the public can misinterpret risks because they do not have, or do not comprehend, the information needed to calculate their risk. Additionally, experts calculate biological risks differently than the public. The public interprets risk as the hazard plus or minus the emotional termed “outrage” the hazard invokes. Social and psychological factors, as well as a person’s background and previous exposure, influence perceptions of risk. These aspects must be understood and overcome to allow for effective risk communication. A number of theories address why people react differently and provide insight into countering both outrage and social and psychological factors and the person delivering the message can also influence perception of risk. The spokesperson represents the experts and must be perceived as empathetic, honest, and knowledgeable to gain the public’s trust. Effective risk communication enables the public to comprehend the message, remember the material, act on recommendations, provide feedback, and help guide future programs and policies. Risk communication allows the public to safeguard their own health and provides information to improve future communication and to build programs and policies the public can embrace. Using the introduction of Ebola virus to the United States as an example of a health risk this essay presents some of the barriers to effective communication and introduces methods to overcome them.
date: 2014-12
date_type: published
publisher: University of Pittsburgh
institution: University of Pittsburgh
refereed: TRUE
etd_defense_date: 2014
etd_submission_date: 2014-11-24
etd_access_restriction: immediate
etd_patent_pending: FALSE
thesis_type: masteressay
degree: MPH
citation:   Taber, Rachel  (2014) Crisis and risk communication: public health issues of hazard, outrage, and Ebola virus.  Master Essay, University of Pittsburgh.   
document_url: http://d-scholarship-dev.library.pitt.edu/23626/1/Taber_Final_12_2014.docx
document_url: http://d-scholarship-dev.library.pitt.edu/23626/3/licence.txt